您的当前位置:首页正文

gre作文满分作文

2022-06-15 来源:知库网

gre作文满分作文8篇。

我们将不敢言说的秘密藏进作文里,我们书写作文,关键在于写出文章的核心思想,如何能写好作文?想对“gre作文满分作文”有深入的了解吗请看下面的资料,本文的目的在于为您的工作和生活提供更多的思路和方法!

gre作文满分作文【篇1】

一般来说考生只要把六级词汇完全掌握,参加gre阅读考试就没有问题,但考生也不要掉以轻心,因为gre阅读中虽然没有生僻词汇,但却经常有长难句出现,考生如果连基本的词汇都没有掌握,那么应对长难句就会力不从心。

gre阅读考试是一项比较全面的考察学生英语能力的内容,所以从词汇开始,一直到句子已经篇章都有对应的练习题类型去考察。但是要理解句子的含义,光是词汇认识也不一定能完全搞清楚,有的时候需要通过语法知识去分析。这种语法在很多题型中有所体现。例如指代题,要分析代词所指的先行词是哪个,有时就要通过句子主谓宾成分的分析才能找到。

英语句子的理解很多时候是要去理解其逻辑关系的,常见的逻辑关系有并列(and, as well),比较(than, as….as),因果(because, so, therefore, thus, result from),递进(also, furthermore),转折(but, however, yet)等等。句子内有这些逻辑关系,句子和句子之间也有这些逻辑关系,这样才能理清整篇文章的脉络,去完成例如句子简化,插入句子这类题型。

gre阅读考试每篇的时间是规定为20分钟,除了看长篇的文章外,还有11或13道题目的内容,所以时间是非常紧张的,因此在阅读的时候速度就很关键。考生要改掉一些阅读的坏习惯,例如逐字阅读,出声阅读,或者指着阅读等,这样的习惯只会拖慢阅读的速度。所以快速阅读能力在考试中是非常重要的,读的时候要以意群来看。

gre阅读的最后一大题都是以全文意思的归纳为基础才能完成的,尤其是summary,考察的就是考生对文章的整体把握。因此考生在平时练习的时候一定要注意对文章段落的归纳,能够在较短的时间内把文章段落的中心大意读出来,然后进行总结,最后选择出最能代表文章中心含义的内容。如果能在平时就注重归纳能力的培养,那么考试的时候就不用害怕summary这种归纳概括性的题型了。

首先是“结论-解释型”文章。这类文章在开始有一个判断句,一般是文章的结论,也是文章的主题。这个判断句的谓语部分通常包含系动词(is, remain, prove, turn out, appear等)或情态动词(can, may, should, must等),而且含有表示态度的词汇(如形容词等)。例如,

Because of its accuracy in outlining the Earth's subsurface, the seismic-reflection method remains the most important tool in the search for petroleum reserves. In field practice, a subsurface is mapped by arranging a series of wave-train sources, such as small dynamite explosions, in a grid pattern…

文章首句指出:“由于‘地震反射法’(sr)在勾划地球的地下层面这方面的准确性,该方法一直是探寻石油储备的最重要的工具。”这是一个判断句,为结论。其中remains为系动词,而most important为态度词,表示作者对“地震反射法”持非常正面的评价。后文应解释“地震反射法”的具体过程。 第二句话对解释进行总的说明:“在实地作业中,通过将一系列波列源,诸如小规模炸药爆炸,排列成一个网格模式,从而将地下层面标绘出来。”接下来是“地震反射法”的详细过程。

GRE阅读文章的第二种常见结构是“新老观点对比型”。 这类文章在开始提出老观点,然后提出新观点并进行论述。通常新观点是文章的主题。老观点出现的标志词有:

1. 传统观点: has been, traditionally, until recently等

2. 大众观点:frequently, widely, many等

新观点出现的标志词有:however, recently, now等。

例如,

Traditionally, pollination by wind has been viewed as a reproductive process marked by random events in which the vagaries of the wind are compensated for by the generation of vast quantities of pollen, so that the ultimate production of new seeds is assured at the expense of producing much more pollen than is actually used.

However, a number of features that are characteristic of wind-pollinated plants reduce pollen waste…

文章首句指出:“传统上,风媒授粉过程一直被视为是一个以随机事件为标志的繁殖过程,其中风的不确定性通过产生大量花粉而得以补偿,因此,新种子的最终繁殖得以保证,而此举的代价是所需产生的花粉要远远超过实际的使用量。”由第一个词traditionally可知文章首句为老观点(由于风的不确定性,风媒植物要产生大量花粉补偿),那么本文的结构是“新老观点对比型”。

第二段首句出现了GRE阅读中的标志性转折词however,说明这句话就是新观点:“但是,风媒植物所独有的一系列特征可减少花粉浪费。”这说明风媒植物除了可以产生大量花粉加以补偿的消极策略之外,还可以通过一些积极机制减少花粉损失,不一定需要产生大量花粉。

GRE阅读文章的第三种常见结构是“现象解释型”。文章开始提出一个现象,然后解释现象。解释是主题。有多个解释时,作者一般对前面的解释持负面评价,对最后的解释持正面评价。提出现象时的标志词有:phenomenon, fact; problem, difficulty, puzzle, question等。例如,

What causes a helix in nature to appear with either a dextral (“right-handed,”or clockwise) twist or a sinistral (“left-handed,” or counterclockwise') twist is one of the most intriguing puzzles in the science of form…What mechanisms, control handedness and keep left-handedness rare?

It would seem unlikely that evolution should discriminate against sinistral snails if sinistral and dextral snails are exact mirror images, for any disadvantage that a sinistral twist in itself could confer on its possessor is almost inconceivable. But left- and right-handed snails are not actually true mirror images of one another…

But this evolutionary mechanism combining dissymmetry, anatomy, and chance does not provide an adequate explanation of why right-handedness should have become predominant…

Here, the evolutionary theory must defer to a theory based on an explicit developmental mechanism that can favor either right- or left-handedness…Thus, the path to a solution to the puzzle of handedness in all snails appears to be as twisted as the helix itself。

是什么样的原因致使自然界中的螺旋体呈现出右旋(“右向旋转的”,或顺时针的)或左旋(“左向旋转的,”或反时针的)?这是形态科学中一个最引人入胜的不解之谜....。。究竟是一些什么样的机制控制着旋转方向,并使左旋的比例为数稀少呢??

假如左旋和右旋蜗牛呈完全一致的镜像对称的话,那么进化对左旋蜗牛不利,这近乎不太可能。几乎无法想象左旋本身会给左旋者带来任何不利之处。然而,左旋与右旋蜗牛彼此间实际上并不呈真正的镜像对称....

但是,这种结合不对称、解剖学和偶然性的进化论机制并未提供一种充分的解释,以说明蜗牛的右旋何以会成为主要的旋向....

于是,进化论必须让位于支持右旋或左旋的明确的发育机制为基础的理论....。。因此,解决所有蜗牛身上旋向之谜的道路似乎与这一螺旋体本身一样曲折复杂。

上文在第一段最后提出一个问题:“究竟是一些什么样的机制控制着旋转方向,并使左旋的比例为数稀少呢??”这个问题就是一个现象:螺旋体中左旋的比例少。有问题就有解答,有现象就有解释。第二段从进化论的角度解释这一现象。但是,GRE阅读文章中一般对进化论的解释持负面评价,所以需要寻找新的解释。第三段否定了进化论的解释。在末段,作者以发育机制(developmental mechanism)解释“为何左旋少、右旋多”。

把握了文章的三种主体结构以后,做文章后的许多题时易如反掌。以上述的“结论——解释型”文章为例,如果熟悉文章的主体结构,下面两道题就很容易找到正确答案。

1. The passage is primarily concerned with

(A) describing an important technique

(C) investigating a controversial procedure

(D) announcing a significant discovery

(E) promoting a novel application

正确答案对应文章首句的主题句。因此(A)为正确答案。

2. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?

(A) A method is criticized, and an alternative is suggested

(B) An illustration is examined, and some errors are exposed

(C) An assertion is made, and a procedure is outlined

(D) A series of examples is presented, and a conclusion is drawn

(E) A hypothesis is advanced, and supporting evidence is supplied

本文的结构是“结论—解释型”,因此(C)为正确答案。

Between 1970 and 1980, energy consumption by United States industry peaked and then declined, so that by 1980 total industrial use of energy was below the 1970 level even though total industrial output had grown substantially in the same period. Industry must have instituted highly effective energy conservation measures in those years to have achieved such impressive results.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion of the argument?

(A) Many industries switched to the greatest extent possible from high-priced oil to lower-priced alternatives throughout the 1970's.

(B) Total residential energy consumption was higher in the United States in 1980 than it had been in 1970

(C) Many industrial users of energy had paid little attention to energy conservation prior to 1970.

(D) Industrial output grew less rapidly from 1970 to 1980 than it had from 1960 to 1970.

(E) The industries whose production dropped sharply during the 1970's included a disproportionately large number of energy-intensive industries.

gre作文满分作文【篇2】

GRE北美范文全揭秘。学习GMAT/GRE写作往往离不开北美范文,但其中良莠不齐,并非篇篇能称之为范,毕竟它们不是ACT/ETS所钦定的文章。

如此说来,Official Guide上的范文就弥足珍贵,无论6分的还是5分、4分的都要仔细分析,尤其是其中所给与的分析和评论更是要细细体味,领悟其精神,然后用心实践。

GRE下面是一篇官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文,我们来一起赏析,看看它为何能scored six

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

gre作文满分作文【篇3】

高二考托福以前虽然我语感已经不错,不过还是只能写那种100多个字的4。6级作文,质的飞跃是托福作文的准备。作文说难真的很难,说简单,其实也就连个关键词:新概念四+动手写。当时我新概念四前面部分的短的文章基本上都背,长的文章感觉超出我的极限,就选了一些段落背(就是那些很八股的考试会用到的内容,那种很kawai的小动物的文章就免了吧)。背了当然会忘,甚至十分钟前背的十分钟后也会忘,我不是超人,和所以问我经验有这些疑问的朋友一样有这些个比较让人郁闷的问题,我的宗旨是只要能保证背以后一个星期的时候记得,能独立背出来就ok了,至于一个星期以后要忘就让他忘去吧,因为文章的精髓,还有语感什么的已经被汲取了。准备托福的时候不需要额外准备什么高深的材料,但是gre还是需要专门准备几个万能的,比如我们可爱的伽利略,还是问题多多的美国总统克林顿尼克松什么的,虽然很俗很陈旧,但是事实证明是多么有用!我一大半的文章都有

伽利略的功劳(这种伟人其实他的各个方面都有值得挖掘的地方,关键是视角问题),正式考试那篇章也用的是这类很一般的例子! 还有一些自己准备的资料是开始动手以后有了体会,知道什么东西是需要的,什么是垃圾,自己去找的。

动手写的问题,托福作文模斑很重要,但是gre一旦被模版这个框框架架束缚就很难精彩,但是我建议大家安全起见应该形成自己的模式。举个例子,一直以来我都不太会写开头,怎么办呢?我后来形成的模式是先甩出一个背好的定义,比如法律类的,我就先说The laws, by definition….怎么怎么样,这种定义一般3行左右,而且因为是备好的,很精炼,也可以稳住刚开始的紧张心态,接下来就随便发挥两句第一段就好了。我强调一下首段很重要!上次托福的.满分和这次g的满分很大原因我认为都在于首段!还有argument的首段gter的训练宗旨是能压就压,但说实话,我考试的那篇没有刻意去压,蛮长的,照样是满分,所以首段感觉充实很

字数问题: 都说500-600够了,高分大概需要600. 我考试那篇大概写了750-800. 我就是这么一个以量取胜的人, 训练初期我也只能写500左右,但是写到40多篇以后,就有了质的提高,好写的文章能写到700,难写的也有600左右. 也许不需要字数多才能拿满分,但是字数多了绝对是充实的体现

提纲问题: issue的提纲我写了大概150多道,累都累死!!!没有必要全部写完,写到后面都大同小异了,写提纲不是只写中心句, 应该包括怎样展开的思路,和一些例子, 一个自己不会展开的论点是一点意义都没有的!所以写提纲其实是比较痛苦的,但是对于文思不敏捷的大多数理科生,还是很有必要!!

机井: 这还用说吗,?太重要了呀!我抽到的题目就是写过的,而且考前几天看过,精心准备过,这一点我得感谢老天的眷顾,感谢作文版斑竹的整理!!

北美范文和嘉文博译还有网上的提纲都是可以借鉴的,上面的例子什么的,说实话,我考试的那篇文章的例子好几个和北美范文一样,当然措辞是有改变的,也没有被判什么抄袭,不过大家要掌握好尺度哦!

就说到这里吧,有什么需要补充的想到再说,我上传了几篇平时写的而且可以和考试那篇媲美的文章,大家可以参考一下,但是我没说也是满分作文哦!各位xdjm加油吧~~~只有而且只要勤奋,aw完全可以轻松突破,相信我----一个作文从4.6级起步的过来人!

gre作文满分作文【篇4】

决定考G本来就是一时冲动的结果,因为对于我来说要付出巨大的时间成本,并且接受短期内得不到任何实际的收益这一事实。

然而,当我看到很多同学纷纷加入到考G行列中,自己也鼓足勇气参加了,就算是为了一个梦,为了自己的将来能有多一点的选择,能够为机会多做尝试。

备考的过程我并没有经历太多的辛酸和劳苦,我很佩服一些学院的同学要在期末顶着论文、实验、期末考试等种.种压力复习备考,我的大量时间大概和大多数人一样花在了单词上。红宝书翻过几遍已经不记得了,也翻过barron's list(但事实证明效果并不好)。

至于说技巧或者经验,在这里我也只能谈一谈我对这个考试的一点感受,希望能给其他同学一点启发。

能拿满分对于我来说很意外。关于字数,当时我的情况大概是:“issue500+”,“argument600+”也许大家都在奇怪为什么我argument能写的比issue多,其实我想告诉大家不要看轻argument,不要因为它容易就倾向性的少付出努力,不要忘记评分的时候两部分的权重是一样的。

argument的模版大家应该见过很多,但在这里我想说的是既不要完全套用模版,因为这样会有雷同的危险,也不鼓励在文章结构上过分的创新,可以参考模版提供的结构。写作时不要让人感觉你是在“码字儿”,文章的思想和逻辑性永远是最重要的,也是拿高分的关键。

所以在开头和结尾的评价总结性语句中,你要注意和你在正文中的分析是否匹配,所谓匹配不在于用几个专业定性的词汇,而是要在细节上完美对应。当然把握这一点并不容易,因为涉及到用词和表达能力,在这一点上就要看你个人的水平了,词不在于华丽,而是要准确并且前后一致,并且尽量减少重复。

Issue也是一样,我一直觉得要“意在笔先”,作文最重要的是你要有话可说,这就是为什么在字数上争论没有意义了,你的观点立意一般,你又没有太多的话可说,字数自然上不去,随意的拼凑不见得能拿高分。关于issue还有一点要说,就是宁愿往深里写也不要扩大范围的泛泛而谈。我写的题目是关于英雄反映了一个社会的价值观的,整篇文章我只引用了MichaelJordan这一个例子,当然在选例子的时候也要有讲究。我看到很多人花很多时间和精力搜集素材,写文章的时候喜欢方方面面地进行列举,我不大赞同这样的做法,因为如果例子不是你熟悉的,引用起来也只能停留在浅层次,而没有深度。

能拿到600分,完全靠的是我阅读的功底,还有一点运气,因为这次阅读相对简单。

考试当天没能够跨区对我来说损失很大,很多题目就是一念之差。所以在这里要提醒大家珍惜做新题目的新鲜感,而不要把过多的时间花在反复看已经解决好了的老题目上。这次G6的类反比并不难,既没有偏词怪词,也没有考什么特别的逻辑关系,但是从题目到题支都很少有和过去题目重复的地方。这就是为什么要大家这样做的原因。

gre作文满分作文【篇5】

gre考试满分作文怎么搞定?

“Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.”

这个gre考试题目分析起来是说学术目的的。作为一个scholar/researcher应该考虑的是自己的感兴趣的领域所在而不是考虑是不是他们的研究成果是对整个大社会大环境有贡献的。这个题目第一眼看起来好象似乎是有理的,但是想到很多时候很多科学家的成果实际是无意义的。美国不是有一个搞笑诺贝尔奖吗?就是奖励类似的研究的。虽然也是科学成果但是根本就没有实际操作的价值或者对人类或者对社会根本就没有意义的。

但是这个contribution在某些时候也可以引申到名利方面。从这个方面来讲,这个题目是可以成立的。

对这个gre写作考试题目进行进一步的分析,可以看出来题目里面有一个比较,非常明显的比较,more来带出来的,所以我们可以说这个speaker的观点是很明显的表明了自己是支持哪个方面的。

Should academic scholars and researchers be free to pursue whatever avenues of inquiry and research that interest them, no matter how unusual or idiosyncratic, as the speaker asserts? Or should they strive instead to focus on those areas that are most likely to benefit society?

拿问句来起头,来质疑。脱离出了一般的解释题目的开头。虽然不是特别特别,但是还是让人感觉比较的attractive。l strongly agree with the speaker, for three reasons.非常直白的陈述自己的观点,同意speaker的观点。

First of all,典型的连接词,开始陈述观点了。Who is to decide which areas of academic inquiry are worth while?又是一个问句,但是这个问句的作用和开篇的问句不同了,是引出来自己论证的第一个方面。Scholars cannot be left to decide.自问自答。

Given a choice they will pursue their own idiosyncratic areas of interest, and it is highly unlikely that all scholars could reach a fully informed consensus as to what research areas would be most worthwhile. Nor can these decisions be left to regulators and legislators, who would bring to bear their own quirky notions about what would be worthwhile, and whose susceptibility to influence renders them untrustworthy in any event.

gre满分作文两个否定句非常干净利索的说出作者的看法,没人有能力来决定什么是应该worth researching的。

Secondly, by human nature we are motivated to pursue those activities in which we excel. To compel scholars to focus only on certain areas would be to force many to waste their true talents. For example, imagine relegating today's preeminent astrophysicist Stephen Hawking——霍金我想就不用介绍了吧—— to research the effectiveness of affirmative-action legislation in reducing workplace discrimination. Admittedly, this example borders on hyperbole(夸张法).Yet the aggregate effect of realistic cases would be to waste the intellectual talents of our world's scholars and researchers. Moreover, lacking genuine interest or motivation, a scholar would be unlikely to contribute meaningfully to his or her “assigned” field of study.

这个部分举例说明了,如果把学者或者科学家局限于某个特定的领域内的话会也会局限其施展自己的talents,是资源的浪费。而缺少动力或者兴趣,人也无法完全发挥自己的talents用辨证的方法说出interest和contribution二者的关系。

Thirdly, it is “idiosyncratic” and “unusual” avenues of inquiry that lead to the greatest contributions to society. Avenues of intellectual and scientific inquiry that break no new ground amount to wasted time, talent, and other resources. History is laden with unusual claims by scholars and researchers that turned out stunningly significant——that the sun lies at the center of our universe, that time and space are relative concepts, that matter consists of discrete particles, that humans evolved from other life forms, to name a few. One current area of unusual research is terraforming——creating biol.ical life and habitable atmospheres where none existed before. This unusual research area does not immediately address society's pressing social problems. Yet in the longer term it might be necessary to colonize other plan in order to ensure the survival of the human race; and after all, what could be a more significant contribution to society than preventing its extinction?

要想获得新GRE满分作文,考生在平时多加练习写作之外,还可以借鉴优秀的范文以及背诵模板与核心句型。此外,多加练习逻辑性也是非常重要的,中国考生写作文往往会出现一些逻辑性错误,而GRE写作最看重的也是逻辑思维能力。

23“Contemporary technology makes available many small pieces of factual information. As a result, people have become so preoccupied with bits of fragmented information that they pay too little attention to the larger issues and overall perspectives.”

1、获得更多信息后可以避免 being limited in thoughts

SARS 时期,全方位了解该事件的信息,virus; contagion; prevention; causes; risks

Christmas; read the news about the prosperous holiday business; want to know more includig customs, origin, legends of Christmas;

3、为了避免被琐碎信息 preoccupied,要学会区分和查找关键信息

23T “Contemporary technology makes available many small pieces of factual information. As a result, people have become so preoccupied with bits of fragmented information that they pay too little attention to the larger issues and overall perspectives.”

现代技术使获得大量细节信息成为可能。其结果是人们全神贯注于七零八碎的信息而很少去注意更大的问题和全局。

①access to great deal of information help people to get a wider view of an issue, thus help them prevent being limited in thoughts.

②in order to discrimitate between important information and trifle ones, people improve themselves in the ability to understand, analyse, compare and rationalize, which is very useful for them to get a better command of large issues ( need profound understanding and capability to deal with complicated cases)

③to prevent preoccupation by fragmented information, people should hold right view on information, not to assimulate all, but to percollate relevant ones from those needing only a glance.

24“People in positions of power are most effective when they exercise caution and restraint in the use of that power.”

political leader 了解权利使用会带来什么影响,制定有效计划

3、过于谨慎小心会难以发挥权利的作用,对管理和统治不利,降低效率

manager of a company; exercise power to fire incompetent or un disciplined employee

24T “People in positions of power are most effective when they exercise caution and restraint in the use of that power.”

.者谨慎并有限度的使用他们权力的时候他们的工作才最有效力。

②当当权者谨慎的考虑如何使用权力时,他们会更有效率。因为就如经济学所说的,他们会在各种方案之中 trade off, 在有限的资源下选择最优方案。如:现在各种政府方案,甚至会引发商业等各界的参与,进行广泛的竞争,对整个社会都是有益的

③但领袖们不可因为考虑审慎而被束缚了手脚。真正的政治家会因目标而选取自己的手段。如:Czar Peter, the blood-and- iron minister in Russia.反面例子:Sun yat-sen

2.1 people without caution and restraint tent to abuse the power they are granted

2.2 caution and restraint assist people to have better understand and make better use of the power

2.3 caution and restraint do not mean tying oneself up

25“Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction—in other words, to make things as simple as possible.”

.意,但简化之前也需要把事情先变复杂 deep understanding

大家都可以把事情弄复杂,因为不需要归纳总结,许多事实、数据、资料堆在一起就显得复杂了;这并不会对工作带来好处,没有效率、不清晰;需要 effort and courage把复杂的事情简化,abstract the essence; make an outline; inform

市场调查,许多背景信息,调查结果关系复杂,重要的是把对公司有用的信息总结出来,如市场发展趋势,消费者购买倾向

2、越是简单明了的东西包含的智慧、努力、勇气越多 简单的东西背后包含了许多努力,把复杂的思想用简单的方式呈现出来

excellent leader is one who can remain calm, seize the strategic point of the problem and give clear instructions when faced wi th complex alternatives. 计算机软件的发展把复杂的事情变的简单易处理,DOS需要许多命令调用程序,windows click the buttons

3、在简化复杂事情之前需要花精力把事情弄得 bigger and complex

full-blown ;对复杂事物简化后得到的事物可以包含主要内容,没有经过充分深入分析某事物,直接用简单的形式表现出来,其实是没有经过思考

teaching; before present the knowledge in a clear way; easy to understand

analyze the relationship among all the knowledge objects, students' previous knowledge structure, ability in understanding; synthesize into a teaching plan which is somewhat complex but can be presented in an intelligible way

1 我们的个人生活正在变得复杂;比如现在的 Audio player 功能越来越复杂,因为 manufacture不用费太多的cost就可以给它们加上 functions of radio ,displaying lyrics and electronic books reader; 人们健康的生活也被赋予了极多的限制,比如很多 specialists甚至邻居大妈都叮嘱我们吃这个可以提高什么含量,进行什么手术可以排除什么的 potential danger。

2 我们的社会的关系太复杂,我们每天生活的太累。比如我们现在的圣诞节,甚至已经变成了一种负担,而不是简单的节日;比如现在盛大而复杂的婚礼,变成了一场闹剧,新郎新娘是小丑一样。我们多么向往过去那些简简单单的生活阿。

3 简单的世界需要勇气和能力,比如苹果的 shuffle,比如reform of official system。

相比科技带给我们的好处,它带来了更多问题,这些问题可能威胁或者毁掉我们的生活质量

1 科技的迅速发展和极度膨胀,给我们带来了很多烦恼。个个领域都出现了各种各样的问题,这使得我们的生活变得不好。比如,先进的科技使得先进的武器成为可能,同样是一个炸弹,现在的能比原来的多炸死几万人,我们的生活随时都会随着一声巨响而消失;比如,互联网的 virus,每年都有 billion dollars 的损失,并且极大的威胁到了我们的隐私,这使的我们在生活中不得不安装大量的杀毒软件并提心吊胆害怕自己的数据被 stolen。从这两个例子来看,我们的生活正在被科技毁掉。

2 然而科技带给我们更多的是好处。尽管很多人都在说科技的不是,但是没有几个人愿意回到过去落后的时代去生活。人们现在的生活因为科技变得方便和丰富多彩。我们想听到我们亲爱的声音看得到她的容貌,永远不再需要骑马狂奔几公里,因为我们有电话,有网络视频;甚至我们可以一踩油门就到了爱人的家门口;因为有了发达的医学,我们不在因为骨折 fracture of bone 而终生残疾,我们也不会因为家人或者朋友感冒而过分担心;因为发达的电视,我们可以坐在沙发上跟随国家地理频道的镜头去旅游……从这个意义上来说,科技大大提高了我们的生活质量,这些提高远大于它们带来的问题。

3 我们也不要因为科技带来的问题过分 pessimistic, 因为各种政府正在致力于解决这些问题。我们很高兴的看到越来越多的国家签署了禁止使用核武器条约,我们也很高兴的看到越来越多的立法来限制企业对环境污染;甚至,越来越多的人参与到保护野生动物的行列中来。科技不是魔鬼,而是我们创造的工具,好好运用,我们的未来是美好的,

25T “Anyone can make things bigger and more complex. What requires real effort and courage is to move in the opposite direction—in other words, to make things as simple as possible.”

.每个人都能把事情搞大搞复杂。而真正需要努力的却是相反的—-------即要把事情越简单化越好

① 事情确实是越变越复杂了。原因:全球化、通信工具都使得人们之间的距离拉近,要解决一个问题要牵扯到很多人。现状:政府机构越来越庞杂 Lending even more credence to th e statement is the so-called “big government” phenomenon. 、学科分类越来越多。

② 人们的解决方法是:简化复杂的事情。A 一部分工作由电脑取代,如复杂的计算、存储和数据分析。B 对工作进行分类,每个人只做一部分,专攻。

③ 把事情简单化从表面来说容易,实际很难,需要对整个事情有通盘的考虑,并能分清主次。to make things simple means to have profound understanding of the whole matter, to discriminate between essence and peripherals, and ulti mately to refine the big and complex body of knowledge into principles

gre作文满分作文【篇6】

本文中小编为各位考生准备了GRE秘籍,便于考生们备考。

1.必须研究范文

尤其是5分和6分的范文,他们真的非常重要,因为那是最权威的辅导资料!不是简单的熟读和背诵,而是逐字逐句的体会作者的意思及修辞。还有提醒一点,ETS对范文的评论也都非常精彩,建议大家参考!这会非常有利于理解考试所考的重点。

2.必须要熟练

重要的是形成惯性思维,考试时间真的是太紧张了,要想现场思考每句话的调理性真的是太难了,反正我没做到,写得时候手指不停的运转,远远超过了大脑运转的速度,只有有充分思维准备的人,才能驾轻就熟,运用自如。题目中提到politics,大脑中就应当出现Franklin Roosevelt, Lincoln, Gerhard Schroeder, Gandhi 提到ART,就该想到Rembrandt, Van Gogh, Starry night, night watch, Hemmingway, the old man and the sea 提到Scandal,就该想到Nixon,Watergate,bill Clinton,sex sandal,Enron总之,熟练是非常非常重要的!

3.必须多修改

如果不勤修改自己的文章,就不知道自己原来的漏洞和不足在哪,闷头写,只能导致lose the stake! 当认真学习一段时间写作之后,再回头改第一篇习作,肯定会发现自己很多毛病,这说明:我们在进步!

gre作文满分作文【篇7】

2016年GRE北美满分作文范文赏析[1]

为您整理了“2016年GRE北美满分作文范文赏析”,方便广大网友查阅!更多GRE留学外语考试相关信息请访问GRE留学外语考试网。

The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

GRE写作范文:

GRE首段

This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

GRE中间段1

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost 0 million versus additional payroll expenses of only ,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

GRE中间段2

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

GRE中间段3

Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

GRE末端

In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。, coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

gre作文满分作文【篇8】

Scholars and researchers should not be concerned akes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, hoay seem.

这个题目分析起来是说学术目的的。作为一个scholar/researcher应该考虑的是自己的感兴趣的领域所在而不是考虑是不是他们的研究成果是对整个大社会大环境有贡献的。这个题目第一眼看起来好象似乎是有理的,但是想到很多时候很多科学家的成果实际是无意义的。美国不是有一个搞笑诺贝尔奖吗?就是奖励类似的研究的。虽然也是科学成果但是根本就没有实际操作的价值或者对人类或者对社会根本就没有意义的。

但是这个contribution在某些时候也可以引申到名利方面。从这个方面来讲,这个题目是可以成立的。

对这个题目进行进一步的分析,可以看出来题目里面有一个比较,非常明显的比较,more来带出来的,所以我们可以说这个speaker的观点是很明显的表明了自己是支持哪个方面的。

Should academic scholars and researchers be free to pursue , no matter hoost likely to benefit society?

显示全文